🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.